AI acceptable use policy generator

Answer a few questions about tools, data, and review to generate a clear AI acceptable use policy you can edit and adopt.

Runs in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent anywhere or saved. A starting template only, not legal advice.

A role or team, such as “The Head of IT”. People will contact them with questions and reports.

Data that must never go into unapproved tools
Prohibited uses

Your policy draft

Draft, not legal advice. This draft was generated from a general-purpose template. It is provided as is, without warranty, and it is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship or guarantee compliance with any law, regulation, or contract. Requirements differ by country, state, and industry. Have qualified legal counsel review and adapt it, and replace every bracketed placeholder, before you adopt it. Delete this note once that review is done.

[Organization name] AI Acceptable Use Policy

1. Purpose

This policy sets out how people at [Organization name] may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including chat assistants, writing and coding tools, and AI features built into other software. It exists to help us capture the benefits of AI while protecting people, data, and our reputation.

2. Who this applies to

This policy applies to all employees and contractors of [Organization name]. It covers any AI tool used for work, whether [Organization name] provides the tool or the person acquired it themselves.

3. Which tools you may use

Use approved AI tools for any work that involves non-public information. [Policy owner] maintains the current list. Public AI tools may be used only for tasks that involve no confidential, personal, or restricted data, such as brainstorming or explaining public concepts.

To request approval of a new tool, contact [Policy owner].

4. Protecting data

Never enter the following into an AI tool that has not been approved for that type of data:

  • Customer personal data
  • Employee and HR records
  • Proprietary source code
  • Non-public financial information
  • Passwords, keys, and other credentials
  • Unreleased products and strategy
  • Confidential information that belongs to customers or partners

When you are unsure whether information is restricted, treat it as restricted and ask [Policy owner].

5. Human accountability and review

AI output can be wrong, biased, or out of date. The person who uses AI output is responsible for it, as if they had written it themselves.

Review and verify AI-assisted work before it reaches customers or is used in decisions that affect people, money, safety, or legal standing. Internal drafts and brainstorming are left to the individual’s judgment.

  • Check facts, figures, citations, and quotations against reliable sources.
  • Test and review AI-generated code before it ships.
  • Don’t pass along AI output you don’t understand.

6. Transparency

Tell customers and other outside parties when they are interacting directly with an AI system, or when AI has produced substantial content that they are relying on.

7. Prohibited uses

The following uses are not permitted:

  • Making hiring, firing, credit, or similar decisions about people without human review
  • Creating deceptive content or impersonating real people
  • Processing regulated data in tools that haven’t been approved for it
  • Giving legal, medical, or financial advice based only on AI output
  • Getting around security, licensing, or access controls
  • Any use that breaks the law, our contracts, or other [Organization name] policies.

8. Reporting concerns and incidents

Report to [Policy owner] the same business day if you believe confidential data was entered into an unapproved tool, an AI tool produced harmful or biased output, or someone has misused AI. Reports made in good faith will not be penalized.

9. Training

Everyone covered by this policy must complete [Organization name]’s AI use training before using AI tools for work, and again when this policy changes in a significant way.

10. Enforcement and exceptions

Violations may lead to disciplinary action, up to and including ending employment or a contract, in line with [Organization name]’s existing policies. Exceptions require written approval from [Policy owner].

11. Review

[Policy owner] will review this policy every six months, and sooner if laws, tools, or risks change in a significant way.

Effective date: [date]. Policy owner: [Policy owner].

Important: this is not legal advice

This draft was generated from a general-purpose template. It is provided as is, without warranty, and it is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship or guarantee compliance with any law, regulation, or contract. Requirements differ by country, state, and industry. Have qualified legal counsel review and adapt it, and replace every bracketed placeholder, before you adopt it. Delete this note once that review is done.

I’m not a lawyer, and this tool is a general-purpose template, not a substitute for advice from a qualified attorney who knows your jurisdiction and industry.

How to use it

  1. Answer the questions. Name your organization and policy owner, choose how strict to be about tools and review, and check the data and uses you want to rule out.
  2. Read the draft. The policy rewrites itself as you change your answers, so you can see exactly what each choice does to the wording.
  3. Copy or download it. Paste the policy into your document tool, or download it as a Markdown file. Then get it reviewed and publish it.

AI acceptable use policies, explained

What is an AI acceptable use policy?
A short document that tells people at an organization how they may and may not use AI tools for work. It names the approved tools, the data that must stay out of them, who reviews AI output, and who to ask or tell when something goes wrong.
What should an AI acceptable use policy include?
At a minimum: its purpose and scope, which tools are approved, what data is off limits, how AI output must be reviewed, when AI use must be disclosed, prohibited uses, how to report incidents, and who owns and reviews the policy. The generator above covers each of these.
Who should own the policy?
A named person or team with the authority to approve tools and answer questions, such as IT, security, or a cross-functional AI council. A policy with no owner is a policy no one updates.
Why does human review matter so much?
AI output can be fluent and wrong at the same time, and a confident tone isn’t a quality check. Someone has to stay accountable for the result, so the policy should say who checks which kinds of work before they reach customers or affect decisions about people.
How often should we update it?
Review it at least twice a year, and sooner when you approve a new class of tool, a regulation changes, or an incident shows a gap. The tools and risks change faster than most policies do.
Is the generated policy legal advice?
No. It is a plain-language starting draft. Rules differ by industry and country, so have legal counsel review it, and fill in the bracketed placeholders, before you adopt it.

I’m Courtney Stephenson, an AI strategy and implementation leader, and I built this tool. Get in touch if you’re rolling out AI and want someone to review your AI rules.

Want a second opinion on your results?

Book a free 15-minute call and we’ll talk through what this means for your team.

Book a 15-minute call